How does General Counsel view the need for this remediation work? What level of risk is acceptable to them?
Confirmation that the way we prioritize content for remediation is okay.
Confirmation on how to treat remediated files in the IR.
Question about remediation for PDF
Try to figure out when to make the PDF accessible, when to change formats, whether to pull the content offline.
AI tools - most products use it as a baseline
Exceptions
One is for archived web content
It has to meet 4 points
Pre-existing electronic documents
Is it currently being used for services programs and activities
Ideally, we would get exceptions. It’s unclear.
Some of us in LIT feel that SA@OSU doesn’t fall into the exceptions.
What about datasets?
Getting the overall answer on the SA content will help with this.
The structure of datasets might be an advantage.
We’ll need to get R&L data people involved in this conversation. If the README or documentation file is accessible that may be okay.
Open Access research articles
Self-deposit
If not meeting standards - is that really OA?
Would accessibility provide another barrier to researchers depositing?
there is another clause in the rule that if making changes changes the nature of the service, this may be an exception.
35.204: “Where a public entity can demonstrate that compliance with the requirements of § 35.200 would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a service, program, or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens, compliance with § 35.200 is required to the extent that it does not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens.”